Prevalence and Characteristics of Impacted Third Molars in a Kosovar Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Zana Sllamniku Dalipi, Ferit K. Koҁani, Zana O. Sejfija

 
International Journal of Biomedicine. 2022;12(2):284-288.
DOI: 10.21103/Article12(2)_OA15
Originally published June 5, 2022

Abstract: 

Background: The goal of this randomized cross-sectional study was to determine the prevalence of impacted third molars in the Kosovar population and to assess the site of impaction using the Winter and the Pell and Gregory classifications.
Methods and Results: A total of 5515 digital panoramic radiographs (PANs) were reviewed to determine the number of impacted third molars, their angulation, and depth. The age range was from 18 to 77 years (29.3±12.8 years). The prevalence of impacted third molars in the sample of the Kosovar population was 73.7%. Of all PANs, one or more impacted third molars were observed in a total of 710 PANs, including 296(41.7%) in men and 414(58.3%) in women, with a sex ratio of 1:1.4; this difference was not significant (P=0.616). The mandible exhibited a substantially greater prevalence of impacted third molars than the maxilla 62.1% vs. 37.9%; P=0.001). In the mandible, significantly higher frequencies of third molar impaction were noted in the distoangular and vertical positions (36.9% and 33.5%). In the maxilla, the most common angulation of impacted third molars was mesioangular (52.8%). Most impacted third molars recorded a Class C depth of impaction (62.3%) followed by Class B (34.9%), and only 2.8% recorded a Class A depth of impaction.
Conclusion: The samples of third molar impaction in the Kosovar population are characterized by a high prevalence of impaction, especially in the mandible. The most common angulation was the mesial in the maxilla as well as in the mandible. The most common level of impaction in the maxilla and mandible was level C.

Keywords: 
impaction • panoramic radiograph • dental radiograph
References: 
  1. Pursafar F, Salemi F, Dalband M, Khamverdi Z. Prevalence of impacted teeth and their radiographic signs in panoramic radiographs of patients referred to Hamadan dental school in 2009. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2011;3:25-31.
  2. Pedro FL, Bandéca MC, Volpato LE, Marques AT, Borba AM, Musis CR, Borges AH. Prevalence of impacted teeth in a Brazilian subpopulation. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Mar 1;15(2):209-13. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1516. 
  3. Marchiori D. Impacted third molars: using 3D imaging to investigate the etiology of a common oral health concern. Thesis. Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan; 2014.
  4. Gisakis IG, Palamidakis FD, Farmakis ET, Kamberos G, Kamberos S. Prevalence of impacted teeth in a Greek population. J Investig Clin Dent. 2011 May;2(2):102-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2010.00041.x. 
  5. Chu FC, Li TK, Lui VK, Newsome PR, Chow RL, Cheung LK. Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies--a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J. 2003 Jun;9(3):158-63. 
  6. Hashemipour MA, Tahmasbi-Arashlow M, Fahimi-Hanzaei F. Incidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars: a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jan 1;18(1):e140-5. doi: 10.4317/medoral.18028. 
  7. Richardson M. The development of third molar impaction. Br J Orthod. 1975 Oct;2(4):231-4. doi: 10.1179/bjo.2.4.231.
  8. Al-Delaimi TN, Abood SW, Khalil AA. The evaluation of impacted third molars using panoramic radiography. Al-Anbar Med J. 2010;8:26-33.
  9. Pillai AK, Thomas S, Paul G, Singh SK, Moghe S. Incidence of impacted third molars: A radiographic study in People's Hospital, Bhopal, India. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2014 May-Aug;4(2):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2014.04.001.
  10. Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Oct;32(5):548-52. 
  11. Haidar Z, Shalhoub SY. The incidence of impacted wisdom teeth in a Saudi community. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Oct;15(5):569-71. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(86)80060-6. 
  12. Hattab FN, Rawashdeh MA, Fahmy MS. Impaction status of third molars in Jordanian students. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Jan;79(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80068-x. 
  13. Kramer RM, Williams AC. The incidence of impacted teeth. A survey at Harlem hospital. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1970 Feb;29(2):237-41. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(70)90091-5. 
  14. Hugoson A, Kugelberg CF. The prevalence of third molars in a Swedish population. An epidemiological study. Community Dent Health. 1988 Jun;5(2):121-38. 
  15. Rodu B, Martinnez MG. The pathology of impacted teeth. In: Ailing CC, Helfrick JF, Ailing RD editors. Impacted teeth. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993. pp. 1-24.
  16. Polat HB, Ozan F, Kara I, Ozdemir H, Ay S. Prevalence of commonly found pathoses associated with mandibular impacted third molars based on panoramic radiographs in Turkish population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jun;105(6):e41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.013. 
  17. Eliasson S, Heimdahl A, Nordenram A. Pathological changes related to long-term impaction of third molars. A radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989 Aug;18(4):210-2. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(89)80055-4. 
  18. Sejfija Z, Koҁani F, Macan D. Prevalence of Pathologies Associated with Impacted Third Molars in Kosovar Population: an Orthopanthomography Study. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019 Mar;53(1):72-81. doi: 10.15644/asc53/1/8. 
  19. Stathopoulos P, Mezitis M, Kappatos C, Titsinides S, Stylogianni E. Cysts and tumors associated with impacted third molars: is prophylactic removal justified? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Feb;69(2):405-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.025.
  20. Peterson LJ, Ellis E, Hupp JR, Tucker MR. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. St. Louis: Mosby; 1988.
  21. Lysell L, Brehmer B, Knutsson K, Rohlin M. Judgement on removal of asymptomatic mandibular third molars: influence of the perceived likelihood of pathology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1993 Nov;22(4):173-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.22.4.8181642. 
  22. Winter GB. The principles of exodontia as applied to the impacted mandibular third molar. St. Louis: American Medical Book Company; 1926.
  23. Pell GJ. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Digest 1933;39:330-8.
  24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74. 
  25. Morris CR, Jerman AC. Panoramic radiographic survey: a study of embedded third molars. J Oral Surg. 1971 Feb;29(2):122-5.
  26. Obiechina AE, Arotiba JT, Fasola AO. Third molar impaction: evaluation of the symptoms and pattern of impaction of mandibular third molar teeth in Nigerians. Odontostomatol Trop. 2001 Mar;24(93):22-5. 
  27. Aitasalo K, Lehtinen R, Oksala E. An orthopantomographic study of prevalence of impacted teeth. Int J Oral Surg. 1972;1(3):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(72)80001-2. 
  28. Björk A, Jensen E, Palling M. Mandibular growth and third molar impaction. Acta Odontol Scand 1956;14:231-72.
  29. Scherstén E, Lysell L, Rohlin M. Prevalence of impacted third molars in dental students. Swed Dent J. 1989;13(1-2):7-13. 
  30. Hellman M. Our third molar teeth, their eruption, presence and absence. Dent Cosmos. 1936;78:750-62.
  31. Kazemian M, Zarch SHH, Banihashemi E, Khajavi MA, Moradi E. Frequency of impacted teeth in patients referred to a radiology center and the radiology department of Mashhad school of dentistry. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2015;14:165-8.
  32. Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey of 3, 874 routine full-month radiographs. II. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1961;14:1165-9.
  33. Ayranci F. Prevalence of impacted wisdom teeth in middle black sea population. J Clin Exp Investig. 2017;8:58-61.
  34. Ventä I, Turtola L, Ylipaavalniemi P. Radiographic follow-up of impacted third molars from age 20 to 32 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Feb;30(1):54-7. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2000.0002.
  35. Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Aug;92(2):150-5. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.115461. 
  36. Nanda RS, Chawla TN. Status of third molar teeth. J Dent Assoc 1959;31:19-29.

Download Article
Received April 18, 2022.
Accepted May 30, 2022.
©2022 International Medical Research and Development Corporation.