Characterization of Primary and Malignant Liver Lesions using Texture Analysis

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Abdalrafia Balla Mohammed, Mohammed Garelnabi, Asma Alamin, Muna A M A Ali Abushanab, Kawthar Moh. Sharif, Amna Mohamed Ahmed, Hamid Osman

 
International Journal of Biomedicine. 2023;13(1):111-114.
DOI: 10.21103/Article13(1)_OA15
Originally published March 3, 2023

Abstract: 

Texture analysis can be used as a classification approach to describe microscopic changes in the liver. In our study, a total of 260 patients aged 4 to 90 underwent successful liver ultrasound examinations using a General Electric ultrasound machine (21045-87) with a 3.5MHz curve-linear transducer, typically used to scan the liver. The liver was scanned in multiple planes (transverse, sagittal, and oblique) to analyze the lesion based on shape, position, size, and echogenicity. Then the pictures were retrieved and classified into 5 categories: normal, a liver cyst, a hydatid cyst, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver metastases. All pictures were 512 x512 pixels with 8-bit gray-level and were encoded in DICOM format; then three FOS features (mean, entropy, and energy, obtained from the intensity function of the images) were calculated for each ROI through all images using a 3x3 window size, and the data were processed for stepwise linear discriminant (SW-LD) analysis. The classification matrix of the original and predicted groups, using the discriminant function, presents the classification accuracy of each class in which 99.2% of normal liver was correctly classified and 75.6%, 81.4%, 100.0%, and 100.0% classification sensitivity for liver cyst, HCC, hydatid cyst, and liver metastases, respectively, with the highest predictive overall accuracy of 89.1%.

Keywords: 
liver • focal liver lesions • ultrasound • texture analysis • first order statistics
References: 
  1. Suganya R, Rajaram S. Content Base Image Retrieval of Ultrasound Liver Diseases Based on Hybrid Approach. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2012;9(6):938-945.
  2. Pons F, Llovet JM. Approaching focal liver lesions. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2004 Aug;96(8):567-73; 573-7. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082004000800006. PMID: 15449988.
  3. Kumar P, Hegde P, Kumar BN, et al. A comparative study of Ultrasound and CT finding in focal liver lesions. Int Bio Med Res, 2014:5(3);4362-4369.
  4. Namasivayam S, Salman K, Mittal PK, Martin D, Small WC. Hypervascular hepatic focal lesions: spectrum of imaging features. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2007 May-Jun;36(3):107-23. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2006.12.004. PMID: 17484954.
  5. Mittelstaedt CA. Ultrasound as a useful imaging modality for tumor detection and staging. Cancer Res. 1980 Aug;40(8 Pt 2):3072-8. PMID: 7397702.
  6. Bates J. Abdominal Ultrasound How, Why, and When. The 2nd edition. Churchill Livingstone Oxford, 2004.
  7. Virmani J, Kumar V, Kalra N, Khandelwal N. SVM-based characterization of liver ultrasound images using wavelet packet texture descriptors. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Jun;26(3):530-43. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9537-8. PMID: 23065124; PMCID: PMC3649043.
  8. Mittal D, Kumar V, Saxena SC, Khandelwal N, Kalra N. Neural network based focal liver lesion diagnosis using ultrasound images. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2011 Jun;35(4):315-23. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2011.01.007. Epub 2011 Feb 18. PMID: 21334176.
  9. Roux C, Coatrieux JL. Contemporary perspectives in three-dimensional biomedical imaging. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;30:1-393. PMID: 10168097.
  10. Haralick RM. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc. IEEE 1979:67:786–804.
  11. Galloway MM. Texture analysis using gray level run lengths. Computer Graphics and Image Processing. 1975:4:172–179.
  12. Sassi OB, Sellami L, Slima MB. Improved spatial gray level dependence matrices for texture analysis. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT).2012;4(6):209- 219.
  13. Gunasundari S, Janakiraman. A Study of Textural Analysis Methods for the Diagnosis of Liver Diseases from Abdominal Computed Tomography. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2013;74(11):7-13.
  14. Pietikainen MK. Texture analysis in machine vision. World Scientific Publishing. 2000:981-02- 4373-1.
  15. Mirmehdi M, Xie X, Suri J. Handbook of texture analysis. Imperial College Press, 2008:1- 84816-115-18.
  16. Tuceryan M, Jain AK. Texture analysis. In: Chen CH, Pau LF, Wang PSP, editors. The handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision. 2nd ed. World Scientific Publishing Co. 1998: ISBN 9-810- 23071-0, Singapore.

Download Article
Received December 26, 2022.
Accepted February 15, 2023.
©2023 International Medical Research and Development Corporation.