Normal Diaphragm Measurements in the Saudi Population Using Posteroanterior Chest Radiograph

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
S. Alghamdi, L. Bushara, D. Bilal, Hind Alghamdi, Ikhlas Abdulaziz, R. Aljondi, S. Aldahery, A. Tajaldeen

 
International Journal of Biomedicine. 2021;11(2):206-211.
DOI: 10.21103/Article11(2)_OA14
Originally published June 5, 2021

Abstract: 

The aim of this study was to establish normal measurements of the hemidiaphragm widths and heights in the Saudi population by a posteroanterior (PA) chest X-ray in the Mecca Region.
>Methods and Results: The data were collected prospectively at King Abdulaziz Hospital in Saudi Arabia, Jeddah, between March and April 2021, using a computed radiography imaging unit. A total of 45 patients (51.1% men and 48.9% women; the age range between 15 and 79 years) were included in the study. Measurements were obtained on an ideal PA chest radiograph by measuring the distance from the highest points of the right hemidiaphragm and left hemidiaphragm. The width from the right and left costophrenic angle was also measured as an ended point. The total diaphragm width (DW) was 278.32±24.83mm, the total right diaphragmatic dome height (RDDH) -51.30±10.58mm, and left diaphragmatic dome height (LDDH) - 38.40±9.21mm.
The DW was greater in men than in women: 291.74±20.4mm and 264.28±21.2mm, respectively. RDDH and LDDH were also greater in men than in women:  55.4±6.77mm and 47.005±12.19mm, and 43.29±6.65mm and 33.28±8.83, respectively
Conclusion: Computed radiography was useful in measuring the diaphragm because measurement points can be identified accurately and easily due to the availability of the processing system functions such as the ability to manipulate the image resolution, image contrast, and magnification.

Keywords: 
diaphragm • chest X-ray • Saudi population
References: 
  1. Nason LK, Walker CM, McNeeley MF, Burivong W, Fligner CL, Godwin JD. Imaging of the diaphragm: anatomy and function. Radiographics. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):E51-70. doi: 10.1148/rg.322115127. 
  2. Kocjan J, Adamek M, Gzik-Zroska B, Czyżewski D, Rydel M. Network of breathing. Multifunctional role of the diaphragm: a review. Adv Respir Med. 2017;85(4):224-232. doi: 10.5603/ARM.2017.0037.
  3. Onders RP, Elmo M, Kaplan C, Katirji B, Schilz R. Extended use of diaphragm pacing in patients with unilateral or bilateral diaphragm dysfunction: a new therapeutic option. Surgery. 2014 Oct;156(4):776-84. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.07.021. 
  4. Iochum S, Ludig T, Walter F, Sebbag H, Grosdidier G, Blum AG. Imaging of diaphragmatic injury: a diagnostic challenge? Radiographics. 2002 Oct;22 Spec No:S103-16; discussion S116-8. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.suppl_1.g02oc14s103.
  5. Puddy E, Hill C. Interpretation of the chest radiograph. Anaesth Crit Care Pa 2007;7:71-75.
  6. Sheard S. The Chest X-ray: a Survival Guide. Clin Radiol  2009;64:1246-1247.
  7. Candelaria I, Oliveira C, Donato H, et al. The diaphragm: revision of the normal anatomy, function and iconographic review of frequent pathology with CT. Eur Radiol 2014.
  8. Gmachowska A, Pacho R, Anysz-Grodzicka A, Bakoń L, Gorycka M, Jakuczun W, Patkowski W. The Role of Computed Tomography in the Diagnostics of Diaphragmatic Injury After Blunt Thoraco-Abdominal Trauma. Pol J Radiol. 2016 Nov 4;81:522-528. doi: 10.12659/PJR.897866. 
  9. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de González A, Miglioretti DL. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2078-86. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427. 
  10. Dubé BP, Dres M. Diaphragm Dysfunction: Diagnostic Approaches and Management Strategies. J Clin Med. 2016 Dec 5;5(12):113. doi: 10.3390/jcm5120113.
  11. Kansal AP, Chopra V, Chahal AS, Grover CS, Singh H, Kansal S. Right-sided diaphragmatic eventration: A rare entity. Lung India. 2009 Apr;26(2):48-50. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.48898.
  12. Kokatnur L, Rudrappa M. Diaphragmatic Palsy. Diseases. 2018 Feb 13;6(1):16. doi: 10.3390/diseases6010016.
  13. SALIH HAA. Measurement of the height difference between right and left hemi diaphragm in normal Sudanese adult using posteroanterior chest radiograph. Sudan University of Science and Ttechnology;  2013.
  14. Klein JS, Rosado-de-Christenson ML. A Systematic Approach to Chest Radiographic Analysis. 2019 Feb 20. In: Hodler J, Kubik-Huch RA, von Schulthess GK, editors. Diseases of the Chest, Breast, Heart and Vessels 2019-2022: Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2019. Chapter 1. PMID: 32096946.
  15. Suwatanapongched T, Gierada DS, Slone RM, Pilgram TK, Tuteur PG. Variation in diaphragm position and shape in adults with normal pulmonary function. Chest. 2003 Jun;123(6):2019-27. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.6.2019. 
  16. Brant WE, Helms CA. Diagnostic imaging methods. Fundamentals of Diagnostic Radiology. 2nd ed Philadelphia (PA). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999.
  17. Chetta A, Rehman AK, Moxham J, Carr DH, Polkey MI. Chest radiography cannot predict diaphragm function. Respir Med. 2005 Jan;99(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.04.016. 
  18. Kazerooni EA. High-resolution CT of the lungs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Sep;177(3):501-19. doi: 10.2214/ajr.177.3.1770501. 
  19. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Rizzo S, Kanarek D, Shepard JA. Radiation exposure from chest CT: issues and strategies. J Korean Med Sci. 2004 Apr;19(2):159-66. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.2.159. Erratum in: J Korean Med Sci. 2004 Jun;19(3):487. Shephard JA [corrected to Shepard JA]. 

Download Article
©2021 International Medical Research and Development Corporation.