Effect of Preheating on Mechanical Properties of Different Commercially Available Dental Resin Composites

Timur V. Melkumyan, Surayo Sh. Sheraliava, Elena Ju. Mendosa, Zurab S. Khabadze, Maria K. Makeeva, Nuriddin Kh. Kamilov, Shahnoza K. Musoshayhova, Angela D. Dadamova, Shukhrat M. Shakirov, Azad A. Mukhamedov

 
International Journal of Biomedicine. 2023;13(4):317-322.
DOI: 10.21103/Article13(4)_OA14
Originally published December 5, 2023

Abstract: 

Background: This study aimed to reveal the effect of preheating on the surface microhardness and shear strength of composite materials used in the restoration of posterior teeth.
Methods and Results: There were 3 composite materials under the study: Estelite Posterior, Harmonize and Filtek Z550. To make static and dynamic tests of them, 120 filling samples were prepared. Of those, 60 samples were for surface hardness measurements and 60 samples were used to evaluate the shear strength of composite materials. We formed 12 study groups with 10 filling samples in each. Samples made off Estelite Posterior, Harmonize™, and Filtek™ were designated with E, H, and F capital letters, respectively; the "VH" abbreviation indicated static Vickers hardness testing and "SS" was assigned for dynamic shear testing; mark (°) was used when preheating was applied. Filling samples were made of heated (up to 60°C) and room-temperature (23-25°C) composite materials. The filling samples of EVH, EºVH, HVH, HºVH, FVH, and FºVH groups were subjected to a surface microhardness test. The samples of ESS, EºSS, HSS, HºSS, FSS, and FºSS groups were subjected to shear-strength assessment of materials. The surface microhardness of filling samples was measured using a ПMT-3 Vickers hardness tester and the Vickers hardness number (VHN) was calculated. Dynamic tests were carried out using an UltraTester machine (Ultradent, Inc., USA) and shear test method until the shear-strength (SS) filling sample had completely failed.
After analysis of the obtained results, it was found that preheating had enhanced the surface hardness and mechanical strength of the composite materials used in the study. However, the positive influence of preheating was significant only in the EVH-EºVH, ESS-EºSS, HSS-HºSS, and FSS-FºSS groups in 1.21, 1.09, 1.33, and 1.16 times, respectively. In the HVH-HºVH and FVH-FºVH groups, the identified differences were not of significance despite the improvement in mean values at 1.08 and 1.1 times.
Conclusion: Preheating of light-curing resin-based composites is not equally effective for static and dynamic mechanical properties of materials for dental restoration. Preliminary laboratory tests could have helped before their clinical use.

Keywords: 
composite materials • preheating • Vickers hardness • shear strength
References: 
  1. Cramer NB, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res. 2011 Apr;90(4):402-16. doi: 10.1177/0022034510381263. Epub 2010 Oct 5. PMID: 20924063; PMCID: PMC3144137.
  2. Ralph Rawls H, Whang K. Advances in Restorative Resin-Based Composites: A Review. Journal of the California Dental Association. 2018; 47(5):311-326.
  3. Beck F, Lettner S, Graf A, Bitriol B, Dumitrescu N, Bauer P, Moritz A, Schedle A. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Dent Mater. 2015 Aug;31(8):958-85. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 Jun 16. PMID: 26091581.
  4. Heintze SD, Ilie N, Hickel R, Reis A, Loguercio A, Rousson V. Laboratory mechanical parameters of composite resins and their relation to fractures and wear in clinical trials-A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2017 Mar;33(3):e101-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Dec 16. PMID: 27993372.
  5. Quinn GD. On edge chipping testing and some personal perspectives on the state of the art of mechanical testing. Dent Mater. 2015 Jan;31(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.378. Epub 2014 Sep 22. PMID: 25244927; PMCID: PMC4272896.
  6. Mengatto CM, Coelho-de-Souza FH, de Souza Junior OB. Sleep bruxism: challenges and restorative solutions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2016 Apr 22;8:71-7. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S70715. PMID: 27217798; PMCID: PMC4853149.
  7. Thayer MLT, Ali R. The dental demolition derby: bruxism and its impact - part 3: repair and reconstruction. Br Dent J. 2022 Jun;232(11):775-782. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4293-8. Epub 2022 Jun 10. PMID: 35689054; PMCID: PMC9187514.
  8. Khosravani MR. Composite materials manufacturing processes. Appl Mech Mater. 2012;110–116, 1361–1367.
  9. Lohbauer U, Belli R, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in mechanical fatigue degradation of dental resin composites. J Dent Res. 2013 Jul;92(7):584-91. doi: 10.1177/0022034513490734. Epub 2013 May 21. PMID: 23694927.
  10. Watts DC, Issa M, Ibrahim A, Wakiaga J, Al-Samadani K, Al-Azraqi M, Silikas N. Edge strength of resin-composite margins. Dent Mater. 2008 Jan;24(1):129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 Jun 18. PMID: 17580089.
  11. Ikejima I, Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation. Dent Mater. 2003 May;19(3):206-11. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00031-3. PMID: 12628432.
  12. Galvão MR, Caldas SG, Bagnato VS, de Souza Rastelli AN, de Andrade MF. Evaluation of degree of conversion and hardness of dental composites photo-activated with different light guide tips. Eur J Dent. 2013 Jan;7(1):86-93. PMID: 23407620; PMCID: PMC3571515.
  13. Martim GC, Kupfer VL, Moisés MP, Dos Santos A, Buzzetti PHM, Rinaldi AW, Rubira AF, Girotto EM. Physical-chemical properties of dental composites and adhesives containing silane-modified SBA-15. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Apr;80:277-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 9. PMID: 29455037.
  14. Park JK, Lee GH, Kim JH, Park MG, Ko CC, Kim HI, Kwon YH. Polymerization shrinkage, flexural and compression properties of low-shrinkage dental resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2014;33(1):104-10. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2013-126. PMID: 24492120.
  15. Liu J, Zhang H, Sun H, Liu Y, Liu W, Su B, Li S. The Development of Filler Morphology in Dental Resin Composites: A Review. Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;14(19):5612. doi: 10.3390/ma14195612. PMID: 34640020; PMCID: PMC8509641.
  16. Leprince J, Palin WM, Mullier T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 May 1;37(5):364-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02066.x. Epub 2010 Feb 19. PMID: 20202096.
  17. Melkumyan TV, Dadamova AD, Sheraliyeva SSh., Kamilov NPh., Daurova FU. Treatment of class II caries lesions with application of packable and conventional resin composites: clinical and experimental study. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2020;10(1):66-69.doi: 10.21103/Article10(1)_OA11
  18. Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Domarecka M, Kopacz K, Sokolowski J, Bociong K. An Evaluation of the Properties of Urethane Dimethacrylate-Based Dental Resins. Materials (Basel). 2021 May 21;14(11):2727. doi: 10.3390/ma14112727. PMID: 34064213; PMCID: PMC8196897.
  19. Randolph LD, Palin WM, Leloup G, Leprince JG. Filler characteristics of modern dental resin composites and their influence on physico-mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2016 Dec;32(12):1586-1599. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Oct 6. PMID: 27720423.
  20. Satterthwaite JD, Maisuria A, Vogel K, Watts DC. Effect of resin-composite filler particle size and shape on shrinkage-stress. Dent Mater. 2012 Jun;28(6):609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Feb 18. PMID: 22342645.
  21. Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: characterizing discrete filler particles and agglomerates using a micromanipulation technique. Dent Mater. 2009 Feb;25(2):180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Jul 24. PMID: 18656254.
  22. Braga RR, Ferracane JL. Contraction stress related to degree of conversion and reaction kinetics. J Dent Res. 2002 Feb;81(2):114-8. PMID: 11827255.
  23. Lohbauer U, Zinelis S, Rahiotis C, Petschelt A, Eliades G: The effect of resin composite pre-heating on monomer conversion and polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater. 2009, 25:514-9. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.006
  24. Prasanna N, Pallavi Reddy Y, Kavitha S, Lakshmi Narayanan L: Degree of conversion and residual stress of preheated and room-temperature composites. Indian J DentRes.2007,18:173-6. 10.4103/0970-9290.35827
  25. Nada K, El-Mowafy O. Effect of precuring warming on mechanical properties of restorative composites. Int J Dent. 2011;2011:536212. doi: 10.1155/2011/536212. Epub 2011 Oct 27. PMID: 22114596; PMCID: PMC3205608.
  26. Fróes-Salgado NR, Silva LM, Kawano Y, Francci C, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Composite pre-heating: effects on marginal adaptation, degree of conversion and mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2010 Sep;26(9):908-14. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.023. Epub 2010 Jun 16. PMID: 20557926.
  27. Lucey S, Lynch CD, Ray NJ, Burke FM, Hannigan A. Effect of pre-heating on the viscosity and microhardness of a resin composite. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Apr;37(4):278-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02045.x. Epub 2009 Dec 29. PMID: 20050987.
  28. Tanimoto Y, Hirayama S, Yamaguchi M, Nishiwaki T. Static and dynamic moduli of posterior dental resin composites under compressive loading. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Oct;4(7):1531-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.024. Epub 2011 May 19. PMID: 21783162.
  29. Baroudi K, Mahmoud S. Improving Composite Resin Performance Through Decreasing its Viscosity by Different Methods. Open Dent J. 2015 Jun 26;9:235-42. doi: 10.2174/1874210601509010235. PMID: 26312094; PMCID: PMC4541310.
  30. Deb S, Di Silvio L, Mackler HE, Millar BJ. Pre-warming of dental composites. Dent Mater. 2011 Apr;27(4):e51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.009. Epub 2010 Dec 9. PMID: 21145580.
  31. Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA, De Goes MF. Monomer conversion of pre-heated composite. J Dent Res. 2005 Jul;84(7):663-7. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400716. PMID: 15972598.
  32. Choudhary N, Kamat S, Mangala T, Thomas M. Effect of pre-heating composite resin on gap formation at three different temperatures. J Conserv Dent. 2011 Apr;14(2):191-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.82618. PMID: 21814365; PMCID: PMC3146116.
  33. Lu H, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Impact of curing protocol on conversion and shrinkage stress. J Dent Res. 2005 Sep;84(9):822-6. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400908. PMID: 16109991.
  34. Nomoto R, Carrick TE, McCabe JF. Suitability of a shear punch test for dental restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):415-21. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00101-9. PMID: 11445209.

Download Article
Received October 10, 2023.
Accepted December 1, 2023.
©2023 International Medical Research and Development Corporation.