Comparative Surgical Strategies for Esophageal Injuries Following Penetrating Thoracoabdominal Gunshot Wounds: Two Case Reports and Literature Review

CASE REPORT
Valmira Abilaliaj, Dritan Cela, Aldo Shpuza

 
For citation: Abilaliaj V, Cela D, Shpuza A. Comparative Surgical Strategies for Esophageal Injuries Following Penetrating Thoracoabdominal Gunshot Wounds: Two Case Reports and Literature Review. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2026;16(1):107-110. doi:10.21103/Article16(1)_CR1
 
Originally published March 5, 2026

Abstract: 

Background: Esophageal injuries following penetrating thoracoabdominal gunshot wounds are rare (<1% of trauma admissions) and carry substantial morbidity if diagnosis and treatment are delayed. We describe two patients with similar injury patterns who were managed with different surgical strategies and summarize the recent literature to contextualize decision-making.
Case Presentations: Case 1 involved a 28-year-old male with thoracoabdominal gunshot trauma, right hemopneumothorax, and distal esophageal leak. Following initial abdominal repair of the diaphragm and esophagus with jejunostomy, a persistent esophageal fistula was detected on postoperative day 5. Endoscopic stent placement achieved complete resolution within 4 weeks. Follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months revealed normal swallowing with no late fistula.
Case 2 concerned an 11-year-old male with hemodynamic instability after a trans-thoracic gunshot wound causing bilateral diaphragmatic, gastric, and hepatic injuries. A right thoracotomy with primary esophageal repair was performed. Recovery was uneventful. At 3 and 6 months, oral intake was well tolerated with no fistula or stricture.
These cases emphasize tailoring the surgical approach to hemodynamic status and imaging findings. A stepwise strategy with delayed thoracic intervention and endoscopic stenting can limit initial invasiveness in stable patients, whereas immediate thoracotomy is lifesaving in unstable cases. Contemporary series support early diagnosis, selective use of endoscopy/stenting, and structured nutritional support to reduce leak risk and mortality.
Conclusions: Individualized timing and modality of surgical intervention, combined with multidisciplinary coordination, are pivotal to optimizing outcomes in penetrating esophageal trauma.

Keywords: 
penetrating trauma • thoracoabdominal gunshot wound • thoracotomy • endoscopic stent
References: 
  1. Mubang RN, Sigmon DF, Stawicki SP. Esophageal Trauma. 2023 Jul 25. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 29261892.
  2. Petrone P, Kassimi K, Jiménez-Gómez M, Betancourt A, Axelrad A, Marini CP. Management of esophageal injuries secondary to trauma. Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1735-1742. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 19. PMID: 28648409.
  3. Petrone P, Kassimi K, Jiménez-Gómez M, Betancourt A, Axelrad A, Marini CP. Management of esophageal injuries secondary to trauma. Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1735-1742. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 19. PMID: 28648409.
  4. Sudarshan M, Cassivi SD. Management of traumatic esophageal injuries. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Feb;11(Suppl 2):S172-S176. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.10.86. PMID: 30906582; PMCID: PMC6389559.
  5. Chirica M, Kelly MD, Siboni S, Aiolfi A, Riva CG, Asti E, et al. Esophageal emergencies: WSES guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2019 May 31;14:26. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0245-2. PMID: 31164915; PMCID: PMC6544956.
  6. Asensio JA, Chahwan S, Forno W, MacKersie R, Wall M, Lake J, et al.; American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Penetrating esophageal injuries: multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma. 2001 Feb;50(2):289-96. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200102000-00015. PMID: 11242294.
  7. Raff LA, Schinnerer EA, Maine RG, Jansen J, Noorbakhsh MR, Spigel Z, et al.. Contemporary management of traumatic cervical and thoracic esophageal perforation: The results of an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):691-697. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002841. PMID: 32590561.
  8. Bhatia P, Fortin D, Inculet RI, Malthaner RA. Current concepts in the management of esophageal perforations: a twenty-seven year Canadian experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Jul;92(1):209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.131. PMID: 21718846.
  9. Aiolfi A, Inaba K, Recinos G, Khor D, Benjamin ER, Lam L, Strumwasser A, Asti E, Bonavina L, Demetriades D. Non-iatrogenic esophageal injury: a retrospective analysis from the National Trauma Data Bank. World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Apr 27;12:19. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0131-8. PMID: 28465715; PMCID: PMC5408440.
  10. Søreide JA, Viste A. Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 30;19:66. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-66. PMID: 22035338; PMCID: PMC3219576.
  11. Herrera A, Freeman RK. The Evolution and Current Utility of Esophageal Stent Placement for the Treatment of Acute Esophageal Perforation. Thorac Surg Clin. 2016 Aug;26(3):305-14. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2016.04.012. PMID: 27427525.
  12. Papaefthymiou A, Gkolfakis P, Basiliya K, Ramai D, Tziatzios G, Sehgal V, Telese A, Norton B, Aslam N, Johnson G, Haidry R. Success rates of fixation techniques on prevention of esophageal stent migration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2024 Jan;56(1):22-30. doi: 10.1055/a-2147-8294. Epub 2023 Aug 3. PMID: 37536365.
  13. Makhani M, Midani D, Goldberg A, Friedenberg FK. Pathogenesis and outcomes of traumatic injuries of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2014 Sep-Oct;27(7):630-6. doi: 10.1111/dote.12132. Epub 2013 Aug 29. PMID: 24033532; PMCID: PMC3938994.

Download Article
Received November 10, 2025.
Accepted December 16, 2025.
©2026 International Medical Research and Development Corporation.