How Age Impacts Lower Arch Changes After Orthodontic Treatment: A One-Year Study

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Burim Kiseri, Arijeta Sllamniku, Aida Rexhepi, Vosa Hamiti Krasniqi, Jeta Kubati

 
For citation: Kiseri B, Sllamniku A, Rexhepi A, Krasniqi VH, Jeta Kubati J. How Age Impacts Lower Arch Changes After Orthodontic Treatment: A One-Year Study. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2025;15(1):171-176. doi:10.21103/Article15(1)_OA20
 
Originally published March 5, 2025

Abstract: 

Background: Post-orthodontic retention is crucial for stabilizing teeth, as shifts can occur after treatment, especially in younger patients with ongoing growth. Understanding age-related differences in lower arch stability is important for improving retention strategies and reducing relapse rates. This study aimed to compare changes in the lower arch within 12 months after orthodontic treatment across different age group patients using a standardized fixed retainer (FR).
Methods and Results: A longitudinal study analyzed 30 dental cast models from patients treated for mild crowding without extractions, all of whom had an FR bonded to the lower arch. Cast models were collected one day after debonding and again one year later. Measurements included the little irregularity index (LII), arch perimeter (AP), premolar width (PW), and intercanine distance (IcD). The sample comprised 15 growing patients of 14–16 years (Group 1) and 15 adults of 19–25 years (Group 2). In the selected cast models, the male-to-female ratio was 0.58:1. Female cast models were significantly more represented than male models, with a difference of 26.6% (P=0.041). Twelve months after treatment and placement of an FR, the mean increase in LII was 0.18±0.24. Group 1 showed a greater increase in LII (0.26±0.26; Z=2.074; P=0.038) and significantly higher AP (Z=3.837; P=0.0001) and PW (Z=4.106; P=0.0001) than Group 2. No significant difference was found for IcD between Groups 1 and 2 (Z=4.106; P=0.967). A significant decrease in LII, AP, and PW was associated with increasing age (R=-0.421 [p=0.021], R=-0.618 [P=0.0003] and R=-0.657 [P=0.00008], respectively). No significant correlation was found between age and IcD.
Conclusion: Growing patients experienced notable changes in the lower arch during the first post-treatment year, emphasizing the need for tailored retention strategies. While IcD remained stable during the 12-month follow-up, the findings raise questions about the long-term effectiveness of non-extraction methods in preserving mandibular arch widths, indicating that changes may predominantly affect the posterior arch. The study results allow for improved retention strategies and reduced relapse rates, improving long-term outcomes.

Keywords: 
fixed retainer • little irregularity index • arch perimeter • premolar width
References: 
  1. Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Aug;108(2):207-13. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70085-4. PMID: 7625397.
  2. Kartal Y, Kaya B. Fixed Orthodontic Retainers: A Review. Turk J Orthod. 2019 Jun;32(2):110-114. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18080. Epub 2019 Jun 1. PMID: 31294414; PMCID: PMC6605884.
  3. Andrén A, Asplund J, Azarmidohkt E, Svensson R, Varde P, Mohlin B. A clinical evaluation of long term retention with bonded retainers made from multi-strand wires. Swed Dent J. 1998;22(3):123-31. PMID: 9768460.
  4. Park H, Boley JC, Alexander RA, Buschang PH. Age-related long-term posttreatment occlusal and arch changes. Angle Orthod. 2010 Mar;80(2):247-53. doi: 10.2319/042109-226.1. PMID: 19905848; PMCID: PMC8973231.
  5. Freitas KM, de Freitas MR, Henriques JF, Pinzan A, Janson G. Postretention relapse of mandibular anterior crowding in patients treated without mandibular premolar extraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Apr;125(4):480-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.012. PMID: 15067265.
  6. Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Işiksal E. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):775-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.022. PMID: 16769496.
  7. Ormiston JP, Huang GJ, Little RM, Decker JD, Seuk GD. Retrospective analysis of long-term stable and unstable orthodontic treatment outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):568-74; quiz 669. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.047. PMID: 16286203.
  8. Gardner RA, Harris EF, Vaden JL. Postorthodontic dental changes: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Nov;114(5):581-6. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70178-7. PMID: 9810055.
  9. Vaden JL, Harris EF, Gardner RL. Relapse revisited. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 May;111(5):543-53. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70291-9. PMID: 9155814.
  10. Melrose C, Millett DT. Toward a perspective on orthodontic retention? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 May;113(5):507-14. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70261-6. PMID: 9598608.
  11. Nanda RS, Nanda SK. Considerations of dentofacial growth in long-term retention and stability: is active retention needed? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Apr;101(4):297-302. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80321-X. PMID: 1558058.
  12. Nanda SK. Growth patterns in subjects with long and short faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Sep;98(3):247-58. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81602-6. PMID: 2403077.
  13. Katsaros C, Livas C, Renkema AM. Unexpected complications of bonded mandibular lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):838-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.011. PMID: 18068606.
  14. Kučera J, Marek I. Unexpected complications associated with mandibular fixed retainers: A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):202-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.035. PMID: 26827976.
  15. Carter GA, McNamara JA Jr. Longitudinal dental arch changes in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jul;114(1):88-99. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70243-4. PMID: 9674686.
  16. Forde K, Storey M, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Eur J Orthod. 2018 Jul 27;40(4):387-398. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx058. PMID: 29059289.
  17. Felton JM, Sinclair PM, Jones DL, Alexander RG. A computerized analysis of the shape and stability of mandibular arch form. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987 Dec;92(6):478-83. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90229-0. PMID: 3479893.
  18. de la Cruz A, Sampson P, Little RM, Artun J, Shapiro PA. Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 May;107(5):518-30. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70119-2. PMID: 7733061.
  19. Haruki T, Little RM. Early versus late treatment of crowded first premolar extraction cases: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod. 1998 Feb;68(1):61-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0061:EVLTOC>2.3.CO;2. PMID: 9503136.
  20. Driscoll-Gilliland J, Buschang PH, Behrents RG. An evaluation of growth and stability in untreated and treated subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Dec;120(6):588-97. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.118778. PMID: 11742303.
  21. Al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van 't Hof MA. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Mar;115(3):300-4. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70333-1. PMID: 10066979.
  22. Ormiston JP, Huang GJ, Little RM, Decker JD, Seuk GD. Retrospective analysis of long-term stable and unstable orthodontic treatment outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):568-74; quiz 669. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.047. PMID: 16286203.
  23. Son W-S, Cha K-S, Chung D-H, Kim T-W. Quantitative evaluation and affecting factors of post-treatment relapse tendency. Korean J Orthod. 2011;41(3):154-63
  24. Gunay F, Oz AA. Clinical effectiveness of 2 orthodontic retainer wires on mandibular arch retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Feb;153(2):232-238. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.019. PMID: 29407500.
  25. Millett D. The rationale for orthodontic retention: piecing together the jigsaw. Br Dent J. 2021 Jun;230(11):739-749. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3012-1. Epub 2021 Jun 11. PMID: 34117429.
  26. Kubati JK, Sllamniku Z, Sllamniku A, Kiseri B. Variations of the Plaque Index in Four Timelines during 12 Months in Patients with Two Models of Fixed Retainers after Orthodontic Treatment is Finished. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2024;14(1):148-52. doi:10.21103/Article14(1)OA23.

Download Article
Received December 4, 2024.
Accepted January 14, 2025.
©2025 International Medical Research and Development Corporation.