For citation: Melkumyan TV, Khabadze ZS, Makeeva MK, Dashtieva MU, Badalov FV, Musashaykhova SK, Hamidov HI, Suleymanov SX, Kulagina NA, Chuan DHK, Seeberger GK, Sakuk BY, Rau JY, Kamilov NKh, Dadamova AD. Enhancing Dentin Bonding of Fifth-Generation Adhesive Through Experimental 10-MDP Primer: A Pilot Study on Human Teeth. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2026;16(1):101-106. doi:10.21103/Article16(1)_OA14
Originally published March 5, 2026
Background: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an experimental primer (EP) based on the 10-MDP monomer when used with the fifth-generation adhesive system.
Methods and Results: Tests were performed on tooth samples from wisdom teeth and premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes. The EP consisted of 10-MDP monomer (10%), ethanol (40%), propanol-2 (30%), water (18%), and a camphorquinone-based photoinitiator system (2%). The pH of the EP was 2.4. The adhesive resin of the fifth-generation OptiBond Solo Plus (OSP) and the universal composite Herculite XRV were the materials of choice. Two adhesive techniques were tested: the traditional total-etch technique with OSP application, and the optional technique with sequential EP and OSP applications using a selective etch approach. Adhesive bond strength was assessed in two groups using the ultra-test technique (Ultradent Products, Inc., USA). All samples in each group underwent two sequential shear bond strength (SBS) tests. The quality of the resin composite adhesion was assessed on four specimens using an FE-SEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific Apreo 2S LoVac). Microleakage assessment was made on 10 teeth. In each tooth, two artificial cavities of similar size were prepared. Fillings were placed using two techniques in each tooth. Depth of dye penetration at the tooth-composite interface was assessed using nonparametric scores. The phase composition of the dentin surface was assessed on six tooth samples divided into three groups of two using thin-film X-ray diffraction (TF-XRD). Samples from the control group were used for XRD of the dentin surface. Samples of Group 1 were used to apply EP to the dentin surface; samples of Group 2 were used for sequential application of EP and OSB to the dentin surface.
A significant difference of more than three times (P=0.000) was observed between the SBS values of the first and second tests in samples from Group 1 compared with those from Group 2. SEM of the filling-to-dentin interface in samples with sequential application of EP and OSP using a selective etch approach showed a more uniform hybrid layer than with OSP application with the total-etch technique. Microleakage analysis of the dentin-composite interface revealed a significantly higher dye penetration rate in samples with the traditional OSP application. The presence of the 10-MDP calcium salt peak at diffraction angle of 2θ=2.54⁰ after sequential application of EP and OSP corresponded to the longest d-spacing (3.48 nm) of the nanolayered structure on the surface of tooth dentin.
- Perdigão J, Araujo E, Ramos RQ, Gomes G, Pizzolotto L. Adhesive dentistry: Current concepts and clinical considerations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jan;33(1):51-68. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12692. Epub 2020 Dec 2. PMID: 33264490.
- Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Jul 3;8(1):1-17. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001. PMID: 28736601; PMCID: PMC5507161.
- Kumar S, Kumar PS, Vidhya S, Mahalaxmi S, Purushothaman PV. Influence of varying dry air temperatures on postoperative sensitivity, penetration depth, and push-out bond strength of an ethanol/water-based adhesive: An in vivo double-blind clinical trial and in vitro analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2023 Jan-Feb;26(1):88-93. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_454_22. Epub 2022 Dec 8. PMID: 36908729; PMCID: PMC10003293.
- Pheerarangsikul N, Wayakanon P, Wayakanon K. Effects of Various Functional Monomers on Adhesion Between Immediate Dentin Sealing and Resin Cement. Oper Dent. 2022 Sep 1;47(5):562-573. doi: 10.2341/21-057-L. PMID: 36121730.
- Melkumyan TV, Kakhkharova DJ, Dadamova AD, Kamilov NKh, Siddikova SSh, Rakhmatullaeva ShI, Seyederfan M. Masouleh. Comparative analysis of in vitro Performance of Total-Etch and Self-Etch Adhesives // International Journal of Biomedicine. 2016; 6(4): 283-286. 10.21103/Article6(4)_OA7
- Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres AP, Vermelho PM, Fronza BM, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Self-etch adhesive systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J. 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):3-10. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201302442. PMID: 25672377.
- Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, Pan Y, Cui Y, Xia W. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin. J Dent. 2017 Jul; 62:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 May 17. PMID: 28527812.
- Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004 Jun;83(6):454-8. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300604. PMID: 15153451.
- Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Matsumoto T, Minagi S, Osaka A, Van Landuyt K, Van Meerbeek B. HEMA inhibits interfacial nano-layering of the functional monomer MDP. J Dent Res. 2012 Nov;91(11):1060-5. doi: 10.1177/0022034512460396. Epub 2012 Sep 11. PMID: 22968157.
- Zhou L, Wang Y, Yang H, Guo J, Tay FR, Huang C. Effect of chemical interaction on the bonding strengths of self-etching adhesives to deproteinised dentine. J Dent. 2015 Aug;43(8):973-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jun 6. PMID: 26054235.
- Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Nakamura A, Hara T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Nano-Layering Adds Strength to the Adhesive Interface. J Dent Res. 2021 May;100(5):515-521. doi: 10.1177/0022034520979133. Epub 2020 Dec 21. PMID: 33345712.
- Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP Based Dental Adhesives: Adhesive Interface Characterization and Adhesive Stability-A Systematic Review. Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 7;12(5):790. doi: 10.3390/ma12050790. PMID: 30866488; PMCID: PMC6427605.
- Tian F, Zhou L, Zhang Z, Niu L, Zhang L, Chen C, Zhou J, Yang H, Wang X, Fu B, Huang C, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Paucity of Nanolayering in Resin-Dentin Interfaces of MDP-based Adhesives. J Dent Res. 2016 Apr; 95(4):380-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034515623741. Epub 2015 Dec 23. PMID: 26701351; PMCID: PMC4802780.
- Ahmed MH, Esteban DA, Attik N, Awad MM. Nanomechanical interlocking mechanism of 10-MDP nanolayering. Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28548. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14181-y. PMID: 40764820; PMCID: PMC12325929.
- Khabadze Z, Abdulkerimova S, Lokhonina A, Generalova Yu, Eremina I, Borlakova M, Dashtieva M, Kulikova A, Magomedova Kh, Mordanova A, Melkumyan T Investigation of Cytotoxicity of Dental Light-Curing Composite Materials. /Journal of International Dental and Medical Research ISSN 1309-100X 2023; 16(4):1489-1493.
- Hiraishi N, Tochio N, Kigawa T, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Monomer-collagen interactions studied by saturation transfer difference NMR. J Dent Res. 2013 Mar;92(3):284-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034512474310. Epub 2013 Jan 22. PMID: 23340212.
- Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Hayakawa S. Atomic level observation and structural analysis of phosphoric-acid ester interaction at dentin. Acta Biomater. 2019 Oct 1;97:544-556. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.029. Epub 2019 Aug 16. PMID: 31425891.
Download Article
Received December 30, 2025.
Accepted February 28, 2026.
©2026 International Medical Research and Development Corporation.




