Leveraging Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in Clinical Microsurgery Dentistry: A Literature Review

REVIEW
Berat Lenjani, Lavdije Leci, Mirsad Shkreta, Besim Hajdari, Ilijana Muratovska, Lorina Rruka, Venera Bimbashi

 
For citation: Lenjani B, Leci L, Shkreta M, Hajdari B, Muratovska I, Rruka L, Bimbashi V. Leveraging Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in Clinical Microsurgery Dentistry: A Literature Review. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2025;15(1):9-16. doi:10.21103/Article15(1)_RA1
 
Originally published March 5, 2025

Abstract: 

Background: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has altered diagnostic imaging in dentistry, providing clinicians with an exceedingly comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) assessment of the craniofacial area. This paper presents a wide-ranging literature review of CBCT’s clinical applications in dentistry.
Methods and Results: An electronic literature search was conducted through the PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases to identify articles in English using the keywords "cone-beam computed tomography," "CBCT applications in dentistry," "advantages of CBCT over conventional radiography," "CBCT in endodontics," and "diagnosis and management of endodontic problems," covering the period from March 2000 to April 2024. The articles were selected by reviewing the titles and abstracts of those containing the term "CBCT in dentistry.”
Cone-beam computed tomography has become a useful adjunct in diagnosing and assessing the management of dentoalveolar injuries, particularly horizontal root fractures.  Cone-beam computed tomography enables navigation of 3D structures in traditional and alternative volumetric planes, enhancing sensitivity for accurately detecting endodontic pathologies and conditions. CBCT technology provides clear images of structures such as nerves and bones that avoid overlapping with other anatomical features. The advanced imaging abilities of CBCT benefit implant procedures by allowing accurate preparation and evaluation of anatomical structures, bone density, and possible issues. As technology progresses, incorporating CBCT into treatment approaches holds the potential to boost precision and enhance results in implant dentistry.

Keywords: 
dentistry • cone-beam computed tomography • dental implant
References: 
  1. Tubiana M. Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen et la découverte des rayons X [Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen and the discovery of X-rays]. Bull Acad Natl Med. 1996 Jan;180(1):97-108. French. PMID: 8696882.
  2. Goldman LW. Principles of CT and CT technology. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007 Sep;35(3):115-28; quiz 129-30. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.107.042978. PMID: 17823453.
  3. Bromberg N, Brizuela M. Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography. 2023 Apr 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. PMID: 37276309.
  4. Abramovitch K, Rice DD. Basic principles of cone beam computed tomography. Dent Clin North Am. 2014 Jul;58(3):463-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.03.002. PMID: 24993919.
  5. Goldman LW. Principles of CT and CT technology. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007 Sep;35(3):115-28; quiz 129-30. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.107.042978. PMID: 17823453.
  6. Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018 May 15;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5. PMID: 29764458; PMCID: PMC5952365.
  7. Nasseh I, Al-Rawi W. Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Dent Clin North Am. 2018 Jul;62(3):361-391. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.03.002. PMID: 29903556
  8. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1558-64. doi: 10.1007/s003300050586. PMID: 9866761.
  9. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007 Sep;33(9):1121-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Jul 19. PMID: 17931947.
  10. Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2009 Jun;42(6):463-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01531.x.
  11. Farman AG. ALARA still applies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Oct;100(4):395-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.05.055. PMID: 16182157.
  12. Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J. 2007 Oct;40(10):818-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01299.x. Epub 2007 Aug 14. PMID: 17697108.
  13. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6 Suppl 1:31-6; discussion 179-82. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.259.x. PMID: 14606532.
  14. John GP, Joy TE, Mathew J, Kumar VR. Fundamentals of cone beam computed tomography for a prosthodontist. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015 Jan-Mar;15(1):8-13. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.157001. PMID: 26929479; PMCID: PMC4762290.
  15. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017 Dec 2;51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S121. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.00289. PMID: 29354314; PMCID: PMC5750833.
  16. Nawawi AP, Rikmasari R, Kurnikasari E, Oscandar F, Lita YA. Volumetric analysis of normal condyles and those with disc displacement with reduction in the Indonesian population: A CBCT study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2022 Mar;52(1):103-108. doi: 10.5624/isd.20210244. Epub 2022 Jan 13. PMID: 35387108; PMCID: PMC8967494.
  17. Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018 May 15;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5. PMID: 29764458; PMCID: PMC5952365.
  18. Low KM, Dula K, Bürgin W, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.022. PMID: 18436034.
  19. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, Azevedo B, Azevedo JR. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2008 Mar;34(3):273-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.023. Epub 2008 Jan 31. PMID: 18291274.
  20. Nakata K, Naitoh M, Izumi M, Inamoto K, Ariji E, Nakamura H. Effectiveness of dental computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of periradicular lesion of each root of a multirooted tooth: a case report. J Endod. 2006 Jun;32(6):583-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.004. PMID: 16728257.
  21. Ee J, Fayad MI, Johnson BR. Comparison of endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning decisions using cone-beam volumetric tomography versus periapical radiography. J Endod. 2014 Jul;40(7):910-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Apr 16. PMID: 24935534.
  22. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Jan;103(1):114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.001. Epub 2006 Apr 24. PMID: 17178504.
  23. Gambarini G, Piasecki L, Miccoli G, Gaimari G, Nardo DD, Testarelli L. Cone-beam computed tomography in the assessment of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):136-143. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_320_17. Erratum in: Eur J Dent. 2018 Apr-Jun;12(2):327. PMID: 29657539; PMCID: PMC5883466.
  24. Simon JH, Enciso R, Malfaz JM, Roges R, Bailey-Perry M, Patel A. Differential diagnosis of large periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomography measurements and biopsy. J Endod. 2006 Sep;32(9):833-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.03.008. Epub 2006 Jul 7. PMID: 16934625.
  25. Marmulla R, Wörtche R, Mühling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005 Jan;34(1):28-31. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/31342245. PMID: 15709102.
  26. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Nov;35(6):410-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/20987648. PMID: 17082331.
  27. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathosis using periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 1: pre-operative status. Int Endod J. 2012 Aug;45(8):702-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01989.x. Epub 2011 Dec 21. PMID: 22188219.
  28. Abella F, Patel S, Duran-Sindreu F, Mercadé M, Bueno R, Roig M. Evaluating the periapical status of teeth with irreversible pulpitis by using cone-beam computed tomography scanning and periapical radiographs. J Endod. 2012 Dec;38(12):1588-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.003. PMID: 23146642.
  29. Cheung GS, Wei WL, McGrath C. Agreement between periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of periapical status of root filled molar teeth. Int Endod J. 2013 Oct;46(10):889-95. doi: 10.1111/iej.12076. Epub 2013 Feb 26. PMID: 23442122.
  30. Venskutonis T, Plotino G, Juodzbalys G, Mickevičienė L. The importance of cone-beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems: a review of the literature. J Endod. 2014 Dec;40(12):1895-901. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Oct 3. PMID: 25287321.
  31. Kolarkodi SH. The importance of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontic therapy: A review. Saudi Dent J. 2023 Nov;35(7):780-784. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.07.005. Epub 2023 Jul 7. PMID: 38025595; PMCID: PMC10658366.
  32. Stavropoulos A, Wenzel A. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws. Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Mar;11(1):101-6. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0078-8. Epub 2006 Oct 18. PMID: 17048029.
  33. Ozen T, Kamburoğlu K, Cebeci AR, Yüksel SP, Paksoy CS. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Mar;107(3):426-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.017. Epub 2008 Nov 8. PMID: 18996725.
  34. Sogur E, Baksi BG, Gröndahl HG, Lomcali G, Sen BH. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Oct;38(7):458-64. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/15206149. PMID: 19767516.
  35. Patel S, Brown J, Pimentel T, Kelly RD, Abella F, Durack C. Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics - a review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2019 Aug;52(8):1138-1152. doi: 10.1111/iej.13115. Epub 2019 Apr 9. PMID: 30868610.
  36. Liang YH, Li G, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. Endodontic outcome predictors identified with periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod. 2011 Mar;37(3):326-31. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.032. PMID: 21329816.
  37. Patel S, Mannocci F, Shemesh H, Wu MK, Wesselink P, Lambrechts P. Radiographs and CBCT--time for a reassessment? Int Endod J. 2011 Oct;44(10):887-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01936.x. PMID: 21896039.
  38. de Paula-Silva FW, Santamaria M Jr, Leonardo MR, Consolaro A, da Silva LA. Cone-beam computerized tomographic, radiographic, and histologic evaluation of periapical repair in dogs' post-endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Nov;108(5):796-805. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.016. Epub 2009 Sep 5. PMID: 19734073.
  39. Fernández R, Cadavid D, Zapata SM, Alvarez LG, Restrepo FA. Impact of three radiographic methods in the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment: a five-year follow-up. J Endod. 2013 Sep;39(9):1097-103. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 21. PMID: 23953279.
  40. Ríos-Osorio N, Quijano-Guauque S, Briñez-Rodríguez S, Velasco-Flechas G, Muñoz-Solís A, Chávez C, Fernandez-Grisales R. Cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: from the specific technical considerations of acquisition parameters and interpretation to advanced clinical applications. Restor Dent Endod. 2023 Dec 11;49(1):e1. doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e1. PMID: 38449497; PMCID: PMC10912545.
  41. Pelé A, Berry PA, Evanno C, Jordana F. Evaluation of Mental Foramen with Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review of Literature. Radiol Res Pract. 2021 Jan 6;2021:8897275. doi: 10.1155/2021/8897275. PMID: 33505723; PMCID: PMC7806401.
  42. Ahmed HMA, Rossi-Fedele G. Preferred Reporting Items for Root and Canal Anatomy in the Human Dentition (PROUD 2020) - A Systematic Review and a Proposal for a Standardized Protocol. Eur Endod J. 2020 Dec;5(3):159-176. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.88942. PMID: 33353923; PMCID: PMC7881390.
  43. Pitale U, Mankad H, Pandey R, Pal PC, Dhakad S, Mittal A. Comparative evaluation of the precision of cone-beam computed tomography and surgical intervention in the determination of periodontal bone defects: A clinicoradiographic study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2020 Mar-Apr;24(2):127-134. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_118_19. Epub 2020 Mar 2. PMID: 32189840; PMCID: PMC7069118.
  44. Betin-Noriega C, Urbano-Del Valle SE, Saldarriaga-Naranjo CI, Obando-Castillo JL, Tobón-Arroyave SI. Analysis of risk variables for association with maxillary sinus mucosal thickenings: a cone-beam computed tomography-based retrospective study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2023 Apr;45(4):417-429. doi: 10.1007/s00276-023-03090-2. Epub 2023 Feb 8. PMID: 36752834; PMCID: PMC10039820.
  45. Rigolone M, Pasqualini D, Bianchi L, Berutti E, Bianchi SD. Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior first molar: "low-dose cone-beam" CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations. J Endod. 2003 Nov;29(11):773-5. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200311000-00021. PMID: 14651289.
  46. Rashid A, Feinberg L, Fan K. The Application of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) on the Diagnosis and Management of Maxillofacial Trauma. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;14(4):373. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14040373. PMID: 38396412; PMCID: PMC10888223.
  47. Sharifi Shoshtari S, Shams N, Dabbaghi A, Rohani A, Dadolahi M, Khosravi N. Effect of Field of View and Resolution in Detection of Horizontal Root Fractures in CBCT images: An In Vitro Study. Iran Endod J. 2018 Fall;13(4):492-497. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i4.21537. PMID: 36883040; PMCID: PMC9985696.
  48. Brady E, Mannocci F, Brown J, Wilson R, Patel S. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures in nonendodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J. 2014 Aug;47(8):735-46. doi: 10.1111/iej.12209. Epub 2013 Dec 11. PMID: 24182358.
  49. Patel S, Brady E, Wilson R, Brown J, Mannocci F. The detection of vertical root fractures in root filled teeth with periapical radiographs and CBCT scans. Int Endod J. 2013 Dec;46(12):1140-52. doi: 10.1111/iej.12109. Epub 2013 Apr 26. PMID: 23617242.
  50. Patel S, Bhuva B, Bose R. Present status and future directions: vertical root fractures in root filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):804-826. doi: 10.1111/iej.13737. Epub 2022 Apr 15. PMID: 35338655; PMCID: PMC9324143.
  51. Yoshino K, Ito K, Kuroda M, Sugihara N. Prevalence of vertical root fracture as the reason for tooth extraction in dental clinics. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jul;19(6):1405-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1357-4. Epub 2014 Nov 15. PMID: 25398363.
  52. Liao WC, Tsai YL, Wang CY, Chang MC, Huang WL, Lin HJ, Liu HC, Chan CP, Chang SH, Jeng JH. Clinical and Radiographic Characteristics of Vertical Root Fractures in Endodontically and Nonendodontically Treated Teeth. J Endod. 2017 May;43(5):687-693. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Mar 11. PMID: 28292598.
  53. Sugaya T, Nakatsuka M, Inoue K, Tanaka S, Miyaji H, Sakagami R, Kawamami M. Comparison of fracture sites and post lengths in longitudinal root fractures. J Endod. 2015 Feb;41(2):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Oct 30. PMID: 25447503.
  54. Habibzadeh S, Ghoncheh Z, Kabiri P, Mosaddad SA. Diagnostic efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography for detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review. BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Jun 1;23(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01024-3. PMID: 37264339; PMCID: PMC10236739.
  55. Wenzel A, Haiter-Neto F, Frydenberg M, Kirkevang LL. Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Dec;108(6):939-45. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.041. Epub 2009 Oct 28. PMID: 19875312.
  56. Vizzotto MB, Silveira PF, Arús NA, Montagner F, Gomes BP, da Silveira HE. CBCT for the assessment of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molar teeth: effect of voxel size and presence of root filling. Int Endod J. 2013 Sep;46(9):870-6. doi: 10.1111/iej.12075. Epub 2013 Feb 26. PMID: 23442087.
  57. Bernardes RA, de Paulo RS, Pereira LO, Duarte MA, Ordinola-Zapata R, de Azevedo JR. Comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiographs in diagnosis of lingual-simulated external root resorptions. Dent Traumatol. 2012 Aug;28(4):268-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01113.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11. PMID: 22233265.
  58. Patel S, Foschi F, Mannocci F, Patel K. External cervical resorption: a three-dimensional classification. Int Endod J. 2018 Feb;51(2):206-214. doi: 10.1111/iej.12824. Epub 2017 Sep 13. PMID: 28746776.
  59. Gaêta-Araujo H, Nascimento EHL, Oliveira-Santos N, Pinheiro MCR, Coelho-Silva F, Oliveira-Santos C. Influence of adjacent teeth restored with metal posts in the detection of simulated internal root resorption using CBCT. Int Endod J. 2020 Sep;53(9):1299-1306. doi: 10.1111/iej.13348. Epub 2020 Jul 9. PMID: 32535964.
  60. Durack C, Patel S, Davies J, Wilson R, Mannocci F. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption. Int Endod J. 2011 Feb;44(2):136-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01819.x. Epub 2010 Nov 17. PMID: 21083575.
  61. Liedke GS, da Silveira HE, da Silveira HL, Dutra V, de Figueiredo JA. Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption. J Endod. 2009 Feb;35(2):233-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.005. PMID: 19166780.
  62. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132. PMID: 356184.
  63. Gupta J, Ali SP. Cone beam computed tomography in oral implants. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;4(1):2-6. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.117811. PMID: 24163545; PMCID: PMC3800380.
  64. Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018 May 15;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5. PMID: 29764458; PMCID: PMC5952365.
  65. Abarca M, van Steenberghe D, Malevez C, De Ridder J, Jacobs R. Neurosensory disturbances after immediate loading of implants in the anterior mandible: an initial questionnaire approach followed by a psychophysical assessment. Clin Oral Investig. 2006 Dec;10(4):269-77. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0065-0. Epub 2006 Aug 26. PMID: 16937108; PMCID: PMC1705496.
  66. Rajput BS, Merita S, Parihar AS, Vyas T, Kaur P, Chansoria S. Assessment of Lingual Concavities in Submandibular Fossa Region in Patients requiring Dental Implants-A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):1329-1333. PMID: 30602636.
  67. Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, Hafezeqoran A, Gavgani FE. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jan;109(1):e32-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.035. PMID: 20123366.
  68. Ziccardi VB, Assael LA. Mechanisms of trigeminal nerve injuries. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2001 Sep;9(2):1-11. PMID: 11665372.
  69. Wang X, Chen K, Wang S, Tiwari SK, Ye L, Peng L. Relationship between the Mental Foramen, Mandibular Canal, and the Surgical Access Line of the Mandibular Posterior Teeth: A Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis. J Endod. 2017 Aug;43(8):1262-1266. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.043. Epub 2017 Jun 22. PMID: 28648488.
  70. Gupta A, Rathee S, Agarwal J, Pachar RB. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):785-789. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2127. PMID: 28874642.
  71. Morgan N, Meeus J, Shujaat S, Cortellini S, Bornstein MM, Jacobs R. CBCT for Diagnostics, Treatment Planning and Monitoring of Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 10;13(10):1684. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101684. PMID: 37238169; PMCID: PMC10217207.
  72. Nelke K, Diakowska D, Morawska-Kochman M, Janeczek M, Pasicka E, Łukaszewski M, Żak K, Nienartowicz J, Dobrzyński M. The CBCT Retrospective Study on Underwood Septa and Their Related Factors in Maxillary Sinuses-A Proposal of Classification. J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 14;13(8):1258. doi: 10.3390/jpm13081258. PMID: 37623508; PMCID: PMC10455419.
  73. Wang W, Jin L, Ge H, Zhang F. Analysis of the Prevalence, Location, and Morphology of Maxillary Sinus Septa in a Northern Chinese Population by Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 15;2022:1644734. doi: 10.1155/2022/1644734. PMID: 35872961; PMCID: PMC9307374.
  74. Sakhdari S, Panjnoush M, Eyvazlou A, Niktash A. Determination of the Prevalence, Height, and Location of the Maxillary Sinus Septa Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Implant Dent. 2016 Jun;25(3):335-40. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000380. PMID: 26866846.
  75. Schiller LA, Barbu HM, Iancu SA, Brad S. Incidence, Size and Orientation of Maxillary Sinus Septa-A Retrospective Clinical Study. J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 24;11(9):2393. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092393. PMID: 35566519; PMCID: PMC9103037.
  76. Yeung AWK, Hung KF, Li DTS, Leung YY. The Use of CBCT in Evaluating the Health and Pathology of the Maxillary Sinus. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 16;12(11):2819. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112819. PMID: 36428879; PMCID: PMC9689855.
  77. Singh V, Bhagol A, Ashwin V. Controversies in the dental implant treatment planning for anterior maxillary aesthetic zone - A review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jan-Apr;14(1):3-8. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_59_20. Epub 2023 Apr 14. PMID: 37273431; PMCID: PMC10235743.
  78. Chatzipetros E, Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Damaskos S, Angelopoulos C. Morphological Assessment of Nasopalatine Canal Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study of 124 Consecutive Patients. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 18;13(10):1787. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101787. PMID: 37238271; PMCID: PMC10217395.
  79. Rues S, Schmitter M, Kappel S, Sonntag R, Kretzer JP, Nadorf J. Effect of bone quality and quantity on the primary stability of dental implants in a simulated bicortical placement. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1265-1272. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03432-z. Epub 2020 Jul 10. PMID: 32651646; PMCID: PMC7878229.
  80. Misch CE. Bone classification, training keys to implant success. Dent Today. 1989 May;8(4):39-44. PMID: 2597401.
  81. Romanos G, Froum S, Hery C, Cho SC, Tarnow D. Survival rate of immediately vs delayed loaded implants: analysis of the current literature. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(4):315-24. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00060. PMID: 20735268.

Download Article
Received October 29, 2024.
Accepted December 12, 2024.
©2025 International Medical Research and Development Corporation.